Fourier's Proof and Its Extensions
Fourier's proof by contradiction
The statement
Theorem. The number is irrational.
The elementary proof below is attributed to Fourier, who presented it in his lectures around 1815; Euler had already obtained the result in 1737 by an entirely different route, the continued fraction expansion of .
Fourier's proof
Assumption for contradiction. Suppose is rational, and write with and .
A preliminary remark about . Since , the number is not an integer, so .
The key quantity. Set
Step 1: is an integer. Write and deal with the two pieces.
On the one hand, the assumption gives
On the other hand, for every , the quotient is an integer, so
Since the difference of two integers is an integer, .
Step 2: lies strictly between and . This is the bound on the remainder established in the previous chapter, multiplied by :
Conclusion. We have constructed an integer satisfying . But there is no integer strictly between and : contradiction. The initial assumption is therefore false, and is irrational.
Why the factorial and not something else
The mainspring of the proof is that "clears" all the denominators of the partial sum at once, while leaving the remainder tiny. It is the combination of these two effects — an integer on one side, a quantity less than on the other — that produces the contradiction.
| Ingredient | Role in the proof |
|---|---|
| provides an exact expression that can be truncated | |
| for | makes an integer |
| makes an integer | |
| makes strictly less than |
Classic pitfall
Forgetting the strict positivity of . Without it, would remain possible, and there would be no contradiction: is a perfectly legitimate integer. But is a sum of terms that are all strictly positive, so — this line, often rushed in written work, is indispensable.

