Using the reciprocal and avoiding pitfalls
The converse of Thales’ theorem
What is the reciprocal used for?
Thales’ theorem allows us to calculate a length when we already know that two lines are parallel. The reciprocal does the opposite: it allows us to prove that two lines are parallel, based on known lengths.
The statement
Let A be a point, and let M and B lie on the same line as A (M lies on [AB]), and N and C lie on the same line as A (N lies on [AC]). If:
AM/AB = AN/AC
then the lines (MN) and (BC) are parallel.
Example
Given that AB = 10 cm, AM = 4 cm, AC = 15 cm and AN = 6 cm.
We calculate the two ratios: AM/AB = 4/10 = 0.4 AN/AC = 6/15 = 0.4
The two ratios are equal, so by Thales’s reciprocal theorem, (MN) // (BC).
Table of conditions to be met
| Condition | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Alignment | A, M, B in a straight line AND A, N, C in a straight line |
| Equality of ratios | AM/AB = AN/AC (calculated separately) |
| Conclusion | (MN) is parallel to (BC) |
Pitfall: do not confuse with the direct theorem
Thales’ theorem (direct) starts from a known parallelism to calculate a length. The converse starts from known lengths to prove a parallelism. These are not the same assumptions nor the same conclusions: reading the question carefully will help you determine which one to use.

