Contractions and Iterated Sequences
Iterated Sequences and Geometric Convergence
The sequence of iterates
Given and a starting point , the sequence of iterates is defined recursively:
If this sequence converges to a real number and is continuous, then taking the limit in the recurrence relation gives : the limit is necessarily a fixed point. The whole question is therefore how to guarantee convergence.
Geometric decay of the error
Suppose is -contracting and has a fixed point . Applying the definition to the pair , and since :
A straightforward induction then gives the fundamental bound:
Since , we have , so : the convergence is geometric, and it occurs whatever the starting point.
A step-by-step example
Let us iterate starting from . The fixed point, called the Dottie number, is .
The error is divided by a little more than every two steps, which corresponds to , well below the bound :
Usable error estimates
In practice we do not know , so the bound in terms of is useless as it stands. Two variants, however, can be computed from the observed values alone:
The first, called the a priori estimate, lets you fix in advance the number of iterations needed; the second, called the a posteriori estimate, turns the gap between two consecutive terms into a bound on the actual error. It is the stopping criterion used in algorithms.
Classic pitfall
Believing that a sequence defined by converges as soon as has a fixed point. For , the fixed point is , and yet the sequence starting from is : it diverges, because . The fixed point is then called repelling. Only contraction guarantees that it is attracting.

